- Without one, the court or jury would believe it is impossible or hard precisely to know other proof in the event, and
- Its value for understanding the full situation all together is significant.
Certain requirements of part 102 must certanly be offered appropriate consideration. Proof that simply “fills out of the photo” isn’t the just like stating that the remainder photo is either impossible or hard to see without it – see R v Lee (Peter Bruce) 2012 EWCA Crim 316
There might be a presssing problem about whether proof of motive is admissible through this gateway.